CuratorSearch
← All comparisons

CuratorSearch vs LinkedIn

LinkedIn is where most people start, and for good reason: it is free, enormous, and the alerts work. This is not a comparison of size — LinkedIn has more museum listings than this board ever will. It is a comparison of which museum roles reach it in the first place.

LinkedInCuratorSearch
Run byLinkedIn / MicrosoftA working curator
CoverageEverywhere, every sectorEurope, UK and North America — 180 live roles
AccessFree to browse with an accountFree to browse a sample; full board on a paid subscription
Pay in advertsNo sector rule; pay shown only where the employer chose toWhatever the institution stated — 22% of live roles do; every figure archived permanently
Where listings come fromEmployers post to the boardGathered daily from 400+ institutions’ own careers pages

Facts about LinkedIn read from their own site on 6 September 2026. If something here is out of date or wrong, tell us and it will be corrected.

What LinkedIn does better

Volume, alerts and the network

More listings, better notification tooling, and the thing no job board can offer: the people. A referral from someone you know moves an application further than any board does, and that is LinkedIn's real product.

The commercial and adjacent roles

Galleries, auction houses, art fairs, agencies, tech and consultancies hiring for cultural work post there and often nowhere else. Those roles are largely outside what this board indexes.

Where this board is different

The roles that never reach LinkedIn

A large share of museum vacancies — public-sector posts, university museums, continental institutions, small foundations — are published on the institution's own careers page and nowhere else, often briefly and often in the local language. Posting to LinkedIn costs money and effort a public museum frequently does not spend. Those roles are exactly what this site reads for.

One sector, sorted the way the sector works

Curatorial, collections, conservation, archives, education, production, leadership. No filtering "curator" out of retail and content-marketing results.

Verified and permanent

Every listing shows the date it was last confirmed open, and closed roles keep their page rather than vanishing. Advertised pay is archived permanently and published as a free dataset.

Being straight about it

LinkedIn is free and this board is not, past a handful of listings. If you are searching in a large US or UK city, LinkedIn plus the sector boards may be all you need. The argument for this site is coverage of institutions that never post to a general board — and it is a real argument, not a claim to be bigger.

Keep LinkedIn for the network and the commercial roles. Use this for institutional vacancies that stay on the institution's own site.

Other comparisons · The pay archive · How listings are gathered